But Amy, this one didn't do very well...and I see that you did great on two of the single ones today. I'll have to think about it...but I will make one for you tomorrow...it just might be a single though. :-)
Oh, Robina, I missed your comment and Mandy's and Amy's!
I actually posted a puzzle for you today though....
http://www.jigidi.com/puzzle.php?id=HFUTATXA
I'll think about posting this in a larger size....but I may post a different instead tomorrow (Thursday). I'll see.
Amy, if you really love these, then I'm thinking that I might post one for you and Robina tomorrow...and then might as well include Ms. Mandy too! :-)
I went to your profile and found this one, which is very like the others, is it asking too much if you could make a copy as large as it will go? I really need lots of pieces to keep my hamster brain occupied! That would be really great :)
Mandy, I never heard of those before! Thanks for the link! I had to use the word "swills" because of Pat's original "sw**ls." She knows that "swirls" can't be used on my puzzles. LOL!
Advia, I wish I'd seen your comment before I posted all my puzzles today. Your wish will be granted tomorrow, and maybe on a one-a-day basis, my dear. :-)
Actually Wendy, upon reflection and a nice snooze, I think swills is very descriptive, but only because it reminds me of spills... not the messy type, but the old fashioned ones gentleman of a certain social standing would use in connection with their pipe lighting rituals - see http://www.roll-ups.co.uk/shopscr1244.html :)))
Karen, Mandy, Pat, whatnauts, and Norma....I'm so glad that you enjoyed solving this one. As far as swill, swells, swirls, and swirly swells are concerned though, these are swills. Pat makes the swirls so mine have to be swills. OK, Mandy, maybe swells.
Wendy, these are definitely not swills.... but they are swell(s) and I think they are fabulous and great fun to solve, particularly in multiples, so thank for yet another wonderful Wendy work of wizardry ;))
Holy Mackerel! I KNOW I just responded to you...and my post is not here! Anyway, the bottom line is that you're right! I'm assuming, of course, that sw**ls = swills.
Comments
Add new comment