For you and maybe others, Sissel, EHoF stands for 'Eternal Hall of Fame'. That's where I keep the winners. Their name will stand on the wall for eternity :-)

No Duracell - just energi from life - a great thing to appriciate :-))) What means EHoF - I have not found out yet - it somthing with high places on topbords??? Miss MiniSpeedy?? :-)))

I read the question and said 1(one) right away, but looking through the answers below, I see Sissel got it first....but I did know the answer. I know it doesn't count now. But thanks, starlord for the teasers......it really is fun !

Here is a picture of the sun just so you won't forget what it looks like. And you can see the dusting of snow I got last night... I guess this is the only way I can send it to you..

No need to slink, ToonyLoones. When you know the answer, you think: How on earth could I have missed that... :-) It is supposed to be misleading. When people see figures and numbers, they tend to start counting to find a logical line in the equasion. I bet Sissel is exhausted of doing the smartie pants dance now :-)

Pretty easy when you keep it simple - but it IS misleading. I think most people would tend to make it more complicated than it really is--thats what I did (I was thinking along the same lines as Robbos). (I'll put on the dunce cap now and slink embarassingly toward the corner of the classroom.)

Over here they would say: you can move one desk forward and you get a kiss from the teacher (which is Kermit). I'm glad you agree, Robbos. Now wasn't this easy after all ? ... :-)

Ewwww, sorry, Sissel, our comments must have crossed :-) And you are right :-)))) Never thought anyone would find it, but if 1 = 5 than it is obvious that 5 = 1 I failed in misleading you, Sissel. Well done :-) You may do the smarty pants dance now :-)))

I'll tell you later, Robbos :-) Maybe someone else will find the correct answer... If I had a chance to tell you in a private message, I would do so and you would agree... That's why I called it 'for smarty pants'... it's ever so easy though... I think. But 3125 is ... not the right answer :-) This is just a matter of misleading that seems to succeed :-)))

Starlord, this is how I managed to come with the answer here. So where did I and Jawz go wrong if the answer is not 3125????

5 to the power of 1 = 5 5 to the power of 2 = 5 x 5 = 25 5 to the power of 3 = 5 x 5 x 5 = 125 5 to the power of 4 = 5 x 5 x 5 x 5 = 625 5 to the power of 5 = 5 x 5 x 5 x 5 x 5 = 3125

## Comments

Add new comment